2. BNDES
  3. 01. Produção BNDES
  4. Produção BNDES - Folhetos
  5. Governance and public transparency: the Brazilian case
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: bibliotecadigital.pre.economia.gov.br/handle/123456789/525992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorMota Filho, Humberto Eustáquio César-
dc.contributorCenter for the Advancement of Public Integrity-
dc.creatorAlfradique, Cláudio Nascimento-
dc.date2019-12-09T17:57:53Z-
dc.date2019-12-09T17:57:53Z-
dc.date2019-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T03:34:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-12T03:34:03Z-
dc.identifierhttp://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/handle/1408/19162-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bibliotecadigital.economia.gov.br/handle/123456789/525992-
dc.descriptionInclui bibliografia: p. 13-14 e notas de rodapé-
dc.descriptionDisponível também on-line em: https://www.law.columbia.edu/public-integrity/governance-and-public-transparency-brazil-
dc.descriptionThis publication is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Center for the Advancement of Public Integrity at Columbia Law School is credited, a link to the Center’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. The paper may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Center’s permission. Please let the Center know if you reprint-
dc.descriptionAiming to provide an overall assessment of the impact of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (“CFRB” - which is in effect since 1988), in the construction of a Democratic State of Law, over the past 30 years, this article investigates how the institutional improvements achieved took form, the transformation of the State's role in the enforcement of human rights and individual guarantees, and the changes that took place towards a democratic political culture, both from the perspective of the citizen relating to the State and the citizen relating to the State's external oversight body (“TCU” - Federal Audit Court). In this sense, this article highlights the circumstances in which the governance of the Federal Executive Branch has been formed in the past thirty years, in what pertains to its oversight, i.e., by analyzing some of the institutional arrangements obtained and the practices adopted in search of greater transparency and wider accountability for the public affairs. In this period, it is possible to assert that there has been progress in the oversight of the activities of the federal government, with a more institutionalized, direct and easier access by all Brazilians to the information of public entities, on the other hand there are not any consolidated or conclusive information regarding the quality of the information received by the citizens.-
dc.format15 p.-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen-
dc.publisherColumbia Law School-
dc.subjectBrasil. Tribunal de Contas da União-
dc.subjectBrazil. Tribunal de Contas da União-
dc.subjectBrasil. Constituição (1988)-
dc.subjectBrasil. Lei n. 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011-
dc.subjectAdministração pública - Brasil-
dc.subjectPublic administration - Brazil-
dc.subjectTransparência na administração pública - Brasil-
dc.subjectTransparency in government - Brazil-
dc.subjectAcesso à informação - Brasil-
dc.subjectAccess to information - Brazil-
dc.subjectResponsabilidade fiscal - Brasil-
dc.subjectFiscal responsability - Brazil-
dc.subjectEstudo de casos-
dc.subjectCase studies-
dc.subjectPolítica pública-
dc.subjectPublic policy-
dc.titleGovernance and public transparency: the Brazilian case-
dc.typeFolheto-
Appears in Collections:Produção BNDES - Folhetos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.